Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-04-09 16:09 EST ------- Well, for -4: * Requires - Still some cleanup seems needed. Well, there are 26 subpackages and examining proper dependency is a bit hard work. I appreciate your good work. Then: ( = means okay, * means some fixes needed ). * ruby-gnome2 - Requires: ruby(glib2) seems unneeded. = ruby-atk = ruby-atk-devel = ruby-gconf2 * ruby-gdkpixbuf2 - ruby-cairo dependency should be ruby(cairo) = ruby-glib2 = ruby-glib2-devel = ruby-gnomecanvas2 = ruby-gnomeprint2 = ruby-gnomeprintui2 * ruby-gnomevfs - Why does this provide ruby(glib2)? Perhaps Requires: ruby(glib2) = %{version}-%{release}? = ruby-gtk2 * ruby-gtk2-devel - gdk-pixbuf-devel is gtk 1.0 version and should not be needed. ? ruby-gtkglext - What provides "require 'opengl'" in /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/gtkglext.rb ? IMO it is http://ruby-opengl.rubyforge.org/ . If you can submit the review request of this (ruby-opengl) soon, would you submit? If not, leave as it is for now. * ruby-gtkhtm2 - This should be ruby-gtkhtml2 = ruby-gtkmozembed = ruby-gtksourceview = ruby-libart2 = ruby-libart2-devel = ruby-libglade2 = ruby-applet2 * ruby-pango - ruby-cairo dependency should be ruby(cairo) * ruby-pango-devel - ruby-cairo-devel seems required. * ruby-poppler - ruby-cairo dependency should be ruby(cairo) (-) ruby(glib2) dependency is redundant because ruby(gtk2) requires ruby(glib2). * ruby-rsvg - ruby-cairo dependency should be ruby(cairo) (-) ruby(glib2) dependency is redundant because ruby(gdkpixbuf2) requires ruby(glib2) = ruby-vte -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review