https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084397 --- Comment #18 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #15) > Re: Qt5 > > In my opinion, Qt5 support is only practical, if it's possible to install > fully parallel-installable Qt4 and Qt5 versions without conflicts. > > What that means, is that the Qt5 version would need different > library/soname, headers, etc... I suspect upstream does not support that > (yet). So probably not something to consider now, but look forward to at > some point in the future. Is it not the case what we have in current Fedora 20? I have installed on my system concurently: qt3-3.3.8b-56.fc20.x86_64 qt-4.8.5-15.fc20.i686 qt-4.8.5-15.fc20.x86_64 qt5-qtbase-5.2.1-6.fc20.x86_64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review