https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078588 --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- > License: GPLv2+ Where does it say "GPLv2 or later"? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#.22or_later_version.22_licenses The file "COPYING" is "License: GPLv2", and the source files don't tell "or later": * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Clarification * https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#NoticeInSourceFile > %clean > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT same as comment 2 > %doc %{_datadir}/ts/* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories > %build > make %{?_smp_mflags} https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags In particular, it will be a small exercise to figure out whether you can use a trick such as %configure || : make %{?_smp_mflags} to reuse the flags exported by the %configure macro (see rpm -E %configure), or whether it will be necessary to activate the flags via a different way (e.g. by patching the Makefile). * fedora-review also says: [!]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag Note: Could not download Source0: http://viric.name/soft/ts/ts-0.7.4.tar.gz See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags ts.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://viric.name/soft/ts/ <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> > ts.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/ts/COPYING https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review