[Bug 1082332] Review Request: nodejs-tiny-lr-fork - A tiny LiveReload server implementation you can spawn in the background

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082332

T.C. Hollingsworth <tchollingsworth@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |tchollingsworth@xxxxxxxxx
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tchollingsworth@xxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from T.C. Hollingsworth <tchollingsworth@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Looking at the names in %{_bindir} I'd guess this will conflict with the
original tiny-lr.  But that upstream seems really dead, so I'm happy to ship
this.

I'd suggest contacting upstream and let them know they can steal the real
tiny-lr name if that upstream is really dead, following the advice in 'npm help
disputes':
https://www.npmjs.org/doc/misc/npm-disputes.html

The note about the tests kinda freaks me out a little, are we too old or they?

Nothing blocking here though, so APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]