https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080062 --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #1) > Only issue I see: > > Multiple packages own %{_datadir}/pari/. Maybe it would be better > to have only pari-gp owning it, and the data ones requring pari-gp. > But this should be a minor cosmetic issue (that could start being > "fixed" now). That would then result in circular build dependencies, e.g.: pari => pari-galpol => pari-gp (which is built from pari) So I think it's best to leave that as it is, as per the other pari data packages. > Some extra comments: > > rpmlint warns about several zero length files, and README tells > they are used as a kind of flag in the database: > ---%<--- > a/b/non-wss: if present, then the group GAP4(a,b) is not weakly > super-solvable, > see ??galoisinit. > ---%<--- > so I presume this is ok. That's what I thought too. In fact, the package would be broken if we didn't include them. I have a pari-2.7.0 build now but so far of the four packages I've tried building against it, three of them (Macaulay2, L-function, genus2reduction) failed and only eclib succeeded. Looks like this update may be quite a bit of work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review