https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080062 Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr | |ade@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr | |ade@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> --- Only issue I see: Multiple packages own %{_datadir}/pari/. Maybe it would be better to have only pari-gp owning it, and the data ones requring pari-gp. But this should be a minor cosmetic issue (that could start being "fixed" now). Some extra comments: rpmlint warns about several zero length files, and README tells they are used as a kind of flag in the database: ---%<--- a/b/non-wss: if present, then the group GAP4(a,b) is not weakly super-solvable, see ??galoisinit. ---%<--- so I presume this is ok. Missing %check is not applicable as the package itself is required for pari %check. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review