https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074969 --- Comment #18 from Adrien Devresse <adev88@xxxxxxxxx> --- Gne ? Listen, I Apologize if my quick message made you angry, I posted it in a hurry. It was nothing personnal. > Forgot to mention: This is NEED-SPONSOR request, which means reviewers are expected to *teach* newcomers to Fedora practices. You (Adrian) failed to do so. i.e. disqualified yourself from being a packager sponsor. You speak without knowing anything. I know Alexandre personnaly, he is in the same organization than me. He did several informal reviews and packaging training during almost one month with me. It's what I name teaching and it is exactly what my sponsor did with me at the time. I fully take his actions under my responsability. If you are not happy with my way to proceed, I'm perfectly open to your explanation of what is "teaching". > You obviously are lacking suffient experience to unterstand the rationales behind this - It's a safety belt against stupid mistakes, which is causing misunderstandings and confusion. I am not willing to tolerate reviewers who accept such bad habits. I have currently more than 200 updates on my own, and around 50 packages under my responsability. A lot of packager ask to not increase the release tag during the review ( includind my sponsor if I remember properly ) for the good and simple reason that it avoids to rollback the release tag to 1 at the first import. If you are not fine with my method, I would be happy to discuss of this. But that does not justify your public attacks nor your agressivity or your way to proceed. Adev -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review