https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077956 --- Comment #3 from David Dick <ddick@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #2) > FIX: BR perl(Exporter), lib/Image/SubImageFind.pm:24, loaded via use_ok() Done. > TODO: I think line 45 is not needed, not even on EPEL. Done. > FIX: This uses some code from http://werner.yellowcouch.org/Papers/subimg/ > in DWVB.cpp. This could probably be considered a derived work and should > include the original license in the License tag ("GPLv2+ and Copyright > only", I'd say). What do you think? I can't find any reference to an actual license for this code at all. I've sent an email to werner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx asking for a clarification of the license terms. > Again, I haven't tried building without those but I don't see any > ImageMagick-devel header files used anywhere. Also, even those glibc-devel > is not on the exceptions list, I think some C library, in whatever form, > will always be available given that a compiler is. Agreed. Spec and SRPMs have been updated, but are waiting for a license clarification from werner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review