[Bug 1065685] Review Request: rubygem-unicorn - Rack HTTP server for fast clients and Unix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065685



--- Comment #10 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
>> - You don't exclude %{gem_cache}.
>
> Good catch, thanks. Fixed in -3.

Can't confirm.

* You should not mark tests as a %doc
  - And there are probably also other directories which should not be marked.

* seds in %prep
  - I would move the seds (especially for the test suite) into %check and kept
    the originals untouched.
  - The rubygems seds are unnecessary IMO. And if they are needed, then just on
    EL6. There are different means to require files for test suite if needed.

* "# Require rubygems during binary invocation"
  - There should be generated bin stubs by rubygems, hence these seds are not
    requires
  - The subsequent copies of binaries in %install sections are wrong from the
    same reasons.
  - Please check with the example the guidelines [1].

* Fix wrong shebang
  - The seds can be modified into oneline version, which would be more
intuitive
    IMO.


[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Building_gems

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]