https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955996 Jeff Fearn <jfearn@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jfearn@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #7 from Jeff Fearn <jfearn@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #5) > (We COULD try to apply the patches which don't break other Qt apps in our qt > packaging, but the more non-upstream patches we apply, the more work it is > to maintain the package, and I haven't looked at the patches to see what > kind of breakage (also for binary compatibility!) they can cause.) Upstream has moved to QT 4.8.5 [1] and had a new release [2]. It might now be easier to workout how much of a burden carrying this as a patch would be on the QT maintainers? If the burden is too much we might seek a bundling exception due to how extensive the modifications are [3]. I have uploaded some test packages of builds for the latest master branches [4], in case anyone wants to see how the new features play out. 1: https://github.com/wkhtmltopdf/qt 2: https://github.com/wkhtmltopdf/wkhtmltopdf/releases/tag/0.12.0 3: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Modified_beyond_a_certain_extent 4: http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/wkhtmltopdf/0.12/F19/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review