https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074515 --- Comment #8 from Jan Kaluža <jkaluza@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #5) > Isn't the description outdated a bit? I thought that the rename is mainly > because passenger is now far more then Ruby thing. Yes, I'm going to fix that. Upstream proposed better description text and I have it already in my local passenger.spec which will be in the new srpm I will upload to this review. (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #6) > And I would appreciate if you can fix bug 1064822. Will do that. (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #6) > And I would appreciate if you can fix bug 1064822. (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #6) > Moreover, I dont udnerstand why you completely dropped the rubygem- and > install stuff into %{ruby_vendor{lib,arch}dir}. This is discouraged practice. You mean why I dropped the "rubygem-" prefix and want the passenger to rename? There are following reasons pointed out by upstream: > It's currently called "rubygem-passenger", but > Passenger is no longer about Ruby only. Nowadays Passenger is a true > polyglot server, with support for Python, Node.js and Meteor as well. > Furthermore, Passenger isn't a gem in the usual sense; it's > distributed over a wide variety of channels such as tarball, deb, > HomeBrew, etc. RubyGems is just another distribution channel for us. Maintainer and other co-maintainers of rubygem-passenger agreed with this change but this decision has not resulted in any action, so I started this process. I treated Passenger as "Non-Gem Packages" category in the Ruby Packaging Guidelines and got the feeling that I should use ruby_vendor* macros. However, if you really think it should be installed into different directories, I can change that, since it's clear you have much more experience with Ruby packages than me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review