https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069257 --- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- According to the FAQ both license texts need to be included if it's the LGPL v3: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#v3HowToUpgrade Since probably not all developers are aware of that, once a project is found that only includes the LGPL v3 terms, a bug report would be justified. Sort of following https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text [...] > fparser_gmpint.hh includes files from gmp-devel, Can't confirm. I only see subdir includes and C++ stdlib: $ grep \#include fparser/* -R fparser/fparser_gmpint.hh:#include "fparser.hh" fparser/fparser_gmpint.hh:#include "mpfr/GmpInt.hh" fparser/fparser.hh:#include <string> fparser/fparser.hh:#include <vector> fparser/fparser.hh:#include <iostream> fparser/fparser.hh:#include <complex> fparser/fparser_mpfr.hh:#include "fparser.hh" fparser/fparser_mpfr.hh:#include "mpfr/MpfrFloat.hh" fparser/fpaux.hh:#include "fptypes.hh" fparser/fpaux.hh:#include <cmath> fparser/fpaux.hh:#include "mpfr/MpfrFloat.hh" fparser/fpaux.hh:#include "mpfr/GmpInt.hh" fparser/fpaux.hh:#include <complex> fparser/fptypes.hh:#include "fpconfig.hh" fparser/fptypes.hh:#include <cstring> fparser/fptypes.hh:#include <map> fparser/fptypes.hh:#include <vector> fparser/fptypes.hh://#include "fpaux.hh" fparser/mpfr/GmpInt.hh:#include <iostream> fparser/mpfr/MpfrFloat.hh:#include <iostream> > What do you think? It's not a big issue. Either add the Requires or not would work. In my opinion, currently it would be cleaner, if no such dependencies were added. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review