https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Lars, thank you for your review!it's really appreciated and this one is a tough one! First of all, I'm very sorry,I should have provided a matching spec file to the srpm! Addressing the issues: - I simply forgot to own %{python3_sitelib}/Django-%{version}-py?.?.egg/ (fixed) - how to test: from pkg_resources import require require("Django >=1.5") import django print django.VERSION (or so) from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python_Eggs#Multiple_Versions "It is highly recommended that any such compatibility packages install a README.fedora file explaining how to use this module. " (fixed) - {__python} vs. {__python2}: I added a macro to the top: %{!?__python2:%global __python2 %{__python}} (to make __python2 run on rhel6 and changed __python to __python2 - I know about all those duplicate files. those are language files. When not listing them, it saves about 200 lines (or so) in the spec file. Will add them back. - the bundled eggs are (currently) required for tests. Will remove them, or will take care not to distribute them in the RPM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review