Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 ------- Additional Comments From petersen@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-04-03 22:58 EST ------- Marcin, perhaps the package should be named "Jomolhari-fonts", ie with a capital like the .zip file? Personally I prefer lowercase package names, but according to Packaging/NamingGuidelines the package name should follow the upstream name. Again there is the problem of the upstream version: the .zip file is versioned "alpha003" and the .ttf filename "alpha003-060520". The latest version mentioned in the font is "alpha 0.003a". Anyway in the circumstances I think your choice of "0.003" is probably the best one. I suggest shortening the Summary in the spec file to just: Summary: Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha should it be "Dzongkha and Tibetan"? Overall the package looks fine to me. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review