https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069050 Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v2 or later)". Detailed output of licensecheck: GPL (v2 or later) ----------------- xfce4-equake-plugin-1.3.4/ltmain.sh GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address) ---------------------------------------------- xfce4-equake-plugin-1.3.4/panel-plugin/equake.c xfce4-equake-plugin-1.3.4/panel-plugin/equake_applet.c xfce4-equake-plugin-1.3.4/panel-plugin/equake_dat.h xfce4-equake-plugin-1.3.4/panel-plugin/equake_func.h xfce4-equake-plugin-1.3.4/panel-plugin/equake_images.h xfce4-equake-plugin-1.3.4/panel-plugin/equake_processdata.c [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package contains icons. Note: icons in xfce4-equake-plugin [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Rpmlint ------- Checking: xfce4-equake-plugin-1.3.4-1.fc21.i686.rpm xfce4-equake-plugin-1.3.4-1.fc21.src.rpm xfce4-equake-plugin.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/xfce4-equake-plugin/README 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint xfce4-equake-plugin xfce4-equake-plugin.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/xfce4-equake-plugin/README 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- xfce4-equake-plugin (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh hicolor-icon-theme libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libcairo.so.2 libfontconfig.so.1 libfreetype.so.6 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgio-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 libpthread.so.0 libxfce4panel-1.0.so.4 libxfce4ui-1.so.0 libxfce4util.so.6 rtld(GNU_HASH) xfce4-panel Provides -------- xfce4-equake-plugin: xfce4-equake-plugin xfce4-equake-plugin(x86-32) Source checksums ---------------- http://archive.xfce.org/src/panel-plugins/xfce4-equake-plugin/1.3/xfce4-equake-plugin-1.3.4.tar.bz2 : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : cdf626f6a10b645f994738a572997cc89405ce5b5c8fd077a886b63056a0a38e CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : cdf626f6a10b645f994738a572997cc89405ce5b5c8fd077a886b63056a0a38e Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -rvn xfce4-equake-plugin-1.3.4-1.fc21.src.rpm Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-i386 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG -------------------->8------------------------ (In reply to Filipe Rosset from comment #2) > Great, thank you. I also run this plugin against the Xfce 4.11-dev (over > F20) and it looks good, all resources still working. Yes, I've tested it under GNOME/XFCE. --------------------8<------------------------ 1. Drop first 2 lines( blank line + # Review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=XXX ), rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. 2. You can replace absolute path to just command name e.g.: /bin/touch --> touch 3. Notify upstream about the dated FSF address. PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review