https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065054 --- Comment #2 from Fl@sh <kaperang07@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Cole Robinson from comment #1) > Does this need to be a new top level package? It shares a lot of data with > your se-sandbox-runner and looks/functions exactly the same, why not just > combine them? > You must understand that these are different types of sandbox. See for: "Background motivation & prototype" (https://www.berrange.com/tags/libvirt-sandbox/). And although their appearance is similar (but not all), but they are made around the different packages are not related to each other. This forces have different applications (which have a similar set of icons). > Also, I question whether it's a good idea to build a graphical tool around a > command line (virt-sandbox), which in itself is a very thin wrapper around > an API that you could just use directly instead. Basically, a graphic interface is designed for ease of setup and storage arguments permanent tasks. This implementation of the sandbox (without API) allows you to run applications in the graphic display terminal and work with them interactively. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review