https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064995 --- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #8) > (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #4) > > (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #3) > > > > - %build section should likely use %{__perl} instead of perl > > > > [...] > > I have always been in favor of "%perl" and consider package which are using > > perl to be sloppily maintainedd, because it > > a) is an absolute path, which avoids picking up an arbitrary "perl" in > > $PATH, and thus improves deterministic builds > Current Fedora practice is to install all tools into PATH directories. SCLs > redefines PATH (and other variables) for this reason. Right - One of the design flaws they suffer from. To be honest, SCLs are a bad joke and should not be used for anything, IMNSHO. > Perl6 has different executable name. Today. At one point in (IMO, very distant) future, /usr/bin/perl would point to /usr/bin/perl6 and the current /usr/bin/perl be renamed to /usr/bin/perl5. > And again any conflicting file names > are urged to rename. Right, that's an effect of what I consider to be Fedora's short-sightedness. However, lets stop this discussion - A review's BZ is not the right place to discuss this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review