Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-04-03 03:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Hmm, I didnt intentionally set fedora-review+. That was a mistake on my part. > > It seems to me that Ralf is just being a hard ass like usual. Watch your language, Togami - There might be a language barrier hitting, but are you really name-calling me as an "arse"? > But it is > reasonable to wait until after upstream makes a new release that has explicit > licenses before building this package. There is no doubt that this package violates: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-76294f12c6b481792eb001ba9763d95e2792e825 because it doesn't contain any licence/copyright notice nor any indication that Fedora is legimitated to ship this package. We have seen packages banned for far less. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review