Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-bioperl - A package of Perl tools for computational molecular biology Alias: perl-bioperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234573 ------- Additional Comments From alexl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-04-03 00:16 EST ------- As an aside, there is currently a discussion on the bioperl-l list about where bioperl should live, on Fedora or in a third-party repository like http://biopackages.net/. See the thread at: http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/bioperl-l/2007-March/thread.html#25279 One of the issue is in addition to this base bioperl package residing here, there is bioperl-run which has interfaces to a number of non-free packages such as Clustal which couldn't be packaged in Fedora. Possibilities are: 1. Host the bioperl - the interfaces to non-free packages on Fedora and package the non-free interfaces on biopackages.net 2. Host all bioperl-* packages on biopackages.net I lean towards 1), but splitting up a single tarball across distributions can be rather messy. Ideas welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review