https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086 --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> --- > That is nonsense, too. There are quite a few examples for packages primarily > living in EPEL, where Fedora is practically not existing, e.g. > python-sphinx10 The only reason for something like that is where there is a requirement of shipping older releases in EPEL like an older version is needed due to the older RHEL package set (eg python 2.6) or where there's desire for multiple versions to be parallel installable. In the original bug report [1] the example you provide was intended and review for both Fedora and RHEL. In a later Fedora release it was clearly decided to drop that, possibly because the dependent applications were ported to the newer release. There continues to be python-sphinx in Fedora [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648633 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review