https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065758 --- Comment #6 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> --- Are you going to post new spec and SRPM? I would rename the package to python-omniORB as well and use: %global realname omniORBpy or upname, sourcename, etc, to use in the Source: tag and %setup. As far as the sub packages, is the -libs package useful without the python sub-package? Also, as I've found out from experience, you can't use %{?_isa} with a noarch package. Just let yum figure it out :) I think after that you should only have 2 or 3 packages total instead of four, in with your current method there is no omniORBpy package so nothing should require it, but after you rename it that will no longer be a problem anyway. I see 3 packages max: python-omniORB (noarch, Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release}) python-omniORB-libs python-omniORB-libs-devel (Requires: %{name}-libs%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review