[Bug 707993] Review Request: 9base - A port of various original Plan 9 tools for Unix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707993

František Dvořák <valtri@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |valtri@xxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #10 from František Dvořák <valtri@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
>From the discussion linked in comment #1, it seems the least controversial way
would be to rename all commands to have some suffix (like "plan9-")? It is
about 50 commands, so it won't look so nice, but it would follow FHS without
exceptions... Do I interpret it correctly? :-)

It is possible to add links (without prefix) to /usr/lib/plan9/. This would
allow users to use 9base directly by modifying PATH, and this would be even
compatible with Debian. 9base is not a library, so there shouldn't be a problem
with multilib IMHO.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]