https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974 John Morris <john@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 (FE-Legal) --- Comment #32 from John Morris <john@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- The license is LGPLv2.1, with a special exception [1]. Setting blocks FE_LEGAL to double-check the License: tag. (Please see below, and comment 25 above.) Since the OCCT license is unacceptable to Fedora, does the exception have any additional meaning as far as what software it may be combined with, or should this software simply be treated as LGPLv2.1 as far as Fedora packaging is concerned? Should the License: tag read just "LGPLv2" or "LGPLv2 with exceptions"? There is a promising project to create a CAM module for FreeCAD. They are considering combining some GPLv3 libraries. Doing so would violate this software license, correct? Also, the file "OCCT_LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt" should be added to %files as %doc. Thanks! [1] https://github.com/tpaviot/oce/blob/master/OCCT_LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 [Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review