https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055378 --- Comment #9 from Michael Friedrich <michael.friedrich@xxxxxxxxx> --- Just a short note with my lead core dev hat on: Icinga 1.x is ~5 years old after forking from Nagios. It runs smooth and stable in small and large scale environments and may act as drop-in Nagios replacement with additional features. See https://wiki.icinga.org/display/Dev/Bug+and+Feature+Comparison for a detailed list. Icinga 2.x is a complete rewrite from scratch providing compatible interfaces (status files, DB IDO, Livestatus, Command Pipe, etc) whilst introducing a new configuration format and additional features such as a native cluster stack based on IPv4/6 and x509. While the transition/upgrade from 1.x to 2.x may not be the easiest (although we're trying very hard), they can run side by side and won't harm each other. Having both packages installed won't hurt the system, they run happily on my laptop every day during development. The Icinga 1.x Classic UI is compatible with Icinga 2.x so at least a "requirement" somehow. Although team Icinga is currently working on a new 2.0 Icinga Web which is probably ready soon. In terms of the review I'd highly appreciate it if Icinga 1.x would hit Fedora and EPEL7 after all those years. The community will definitely appreciate it. Once Icinga (Web) 2.x are ready for their final releases (hopefully Q2 but never say never), packages and review requests should be pushed seperately imho. If you want to testdrive Icinga 2 RPMs - Snapshot SRPMs are available here http://packages.icinga.org/epel/6/snapshot/src/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review