Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_shadow - An Apache module for authentication using /etc/shadow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234445 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-04-02 08:43 EST ------- Spec URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/mod_auth_shadow.spec SRPM URL: http://david.dw-perspective.org.uk/tmp/mod_auth_shadow-2.1-3.src.rpm Thanks wolfshant. New versions. I disagree with those guidelines, as the GPL itself requires that the GPL be included in the distribution. It seems to me that Fedora can't redistribute without fulfilling those terms. Upstream isn't bound by those terms as it's the copyright holder, but we are, so we ought to include a copy of the GPL. So I think Tom Callaway has got that wrong. But, I don't make the rules, so the new SRPM I've uploaded does it the suggested way... I assume that Fedora legal knows what it's doing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review