[Bug 1020942] Package Request: wxGTK3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942



--- Comment #22 from Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #21)
> My confusion mainly revolves around the fact that alternatives would imply
> that the same functionality is provided, but this is not the case.
> From what I see, moving and patching is the correct way of doing this,
> though I will admit that I'm very unsure on this subject.
> 
> Would adding a conflict between the two devel packages also be out of the
> question?

after thinking more about it I think using Conflicts is probably the way to go,
the devel packages can't be made parallel installable with all functionality
included (bakefiles, wx-config and wxwin.m4), all of these would have to
versioned somehow and it doesn't seem to be feasible

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]