https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942 --- Comment #20 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Dan Horák from comment #19) > (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #17) > > Ok, a couple of questions/differences about your spec... > > > > 1. You move the bakefiles but Dan's spec mentions that they're not supported > > and just deletes them. > > this seems to be being out-of-sync in the wxGTK3 spec, bakefiles are > installed in the wxGTK2 spec for some time Would you suggest to include these then? > > 2. I've got the compat26 option enabled right now... I'm not sure we need it > > since 2.8 should have this enabled... > > IMHO the wxGTK3 package should be a clean wxGTK3 without enabling the wxGTK2 > compat methods Agreed, there is no need for overlap > > 3. I'm building against GTK3 instead of GTK2 but I'm assuming that's OK with > > you. > > > > That seems to be the big stuff... > > and as for wx-config using alternatives should work for switching between > wxGTK2 and wxGTK3 > > and there is also a question of wxwin.m4 installed in /usr/share/aclocal in > wxGTK2 package, but %excluded in wxGTK3, again the alternatives could do the > work Is there an advantage to using alternatives? Wouldn't patching be just fine? I would like to hear your feedback as I maybe missing something. Also what is the value of wxwin.m4? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review