https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055396 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- The first eight issues are repeats from the previous reviews: 1) Remove the internal dependency generator workarounds. 2) Build a usable -debuginfo package on platforms that generate binary code. 3) The build requires ocaml-findlib only, not ocaml-findlib-devel. 4) Add ExclusiveArch: %{ocaml_arches} to the spec file. 5) Add %{?_isa} to the -devel dependency on the main package. 6) Remove rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT from the top of %install. 7) Move %define libname down farther and make it %global instead. 8) If possible, don't build both bytecode and native. 9) There is no justification for the patch, but I think it is not needed. Just replace the "export DESTDIR=..." line in %install with this: export PREFIX=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 19 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/jamesjer/1055396-ocaml- yojson/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [!]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [!]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Ocaml: [x]: This should never happen ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in ocaml- yojson-devel [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [!]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Note: %define requiring justification: %define libname %(echo %{name} | sed -e 's/^ocaml-//') [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ocaml-yojson-1.1.8-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm ocaml-yojson-devel-1.1.8-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm ocaml-yojson-1.1.8-1.fc21.src.rpm ocaml-yojson.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US json -> son, j son ocaml-yojson.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tuples -> letups ocaml-yojson.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US atdgen -> attend ocaml-yojson.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serializers -> serializes, serialize rs, serialize-rs ocaml-yojson.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US deserializers -> serializes, depersonalizes, materializes ocaml-yojson.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ydump ocaml-yojson.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US json -> son, j son ocaml-yojson.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tuples -> letups ocaml-yojson.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ydump -> dump, dumpy, y dump ocaml-yojson.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US atdgen -> attend ocaml-yojson.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serializers -> serializes, serialize rs, serialize-rs ocaml-yojson.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US deserializers -> serializes, depersonalizes, materializes 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint ocaml-yojson-devel ocaml-yojson ocaml-yojson.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US json -> son, j son ocaml-yojson.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tuples -> letups ocaml-yojson.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US atdgen -> attend ocaml-yojson.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serializers -> serializes, serialize rs, serialize-rs ocaml-yojson.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US deserializers -> serializes, depersonalizes, materializes ocaml-yojson.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ydump 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- ocaml-yojson-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ocaml-yojson ocaml-yojson (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ocaml(Array) ocaml(Bi_inbuf) ocaml(Bi_io) ocaml(Bi_outbuf) ocaml(Bi_share) ocaml(Buffer) ocaml(Char) ocaml(Easy_format) ocaml(Format) ocaml(Int32) ocaml(Int64) ocaml(Lexing) ocaml(List) ocaml(Obj) ocaml(Pervasives) ocaml(Printf) ocaml(Stream) ocaml(String) ocaml(runtime) Provides -------- ocaml-yojson-devel: ocaml-yojson-devel ocaml-yojson-devel(x86-64) ocaml-yojson: ocaml(Yojson) ocaml(Yojson_biniou) ocaml-yojson ocaml-yojson(x86-64) Source checksums ---------------- http://mjambon.com/releases/yojson/yojson-1.1.8.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 3b8b56369bb2633be8366c17e45732dd852e764fb319ec5ddbeada1adb09dd2b CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 3b8b56369bb2633be8366c17e45732dd852e764fb319ec5ddbeada1adb09dd2b Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1055396 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Ocaml Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review