[Bug 1022551] Review Request: bouncycastle-pkix - CMS, PKCS, EAC, TSP, CMP, CRMF, OCSP for Bouncy Castle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022551

Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Hi!

Maybe the current maintainer of bouncycastle-tsp might be interested. At a
closer inspection, it looks like all the classes in the old bctsp.jar are now
part of the bcpkix.jar.

I should probably change [-] to [!] here:

[!]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
     bouncycastle-pkix should obsolete bouncycastle-tsp < 1.47. Not sure if a
     provides is reasonable, but maybe.

It would make sense if al the bouncycastle{,-mail,-pg,-pkix} where maintained
by the same packagers. The packages depend on each other with exact version
dependencies and must therefore be updated together. I would also like to see a
updated version of the bouncycastle packages in EPEL 7.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]