Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-30 09:26 EST ------- >- Either "samba-swat" must require "samba-doc", or move "docs/htmldocs" to > "samba-swat" sub-package (else swat will contain broken links to help/docs) Oops, actually another situation here :) Currently "samba-swat" has all needed stuff, but it is completely duplicated in samba-doc (Consider, f.e., /usr/share/swat/{help,using_samba} and /usr/share/doc/samba-doc-3.0.24/htmldocs ). Maybe leave all swat-needed in swat, all "big" PDFs and similar go to samba-doc, all another things (examples, readmes etc.) go as "%doc" to an appropriate subpackage. (BTW, now user have to install all the docs just to obtain some small example files etc.) I doubt whether samba.schema file should be provided in its "true" place, /etc/openldap/schema. It leads to both openldap and samba own this dir... Anyway a ldap admin must add "include /etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema" manually to the /etc/openldap/slapd.conf file, therefore it is not too hard to him/her to move the file to the right place just before slapd.conf editing. Moreover, since the samba.schema file is not marked as %config, it can be (unexpectedly) overwritten at the next samba update, which can potentially conflict with the actual ldap base's data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review