[Bug 1005785] Review Request: snowball - Libstemmer Java bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005785

Michael Simacek <msimacek@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |msimacek@xxxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?



--- Comment #5 from Michael Simacek <msimacek@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
> i dont need C libraries ... and for now i dont have intentions to package
> this libs

Ok. It is distributed separately by upstream, so it shouldn't be a problem.

The description is now ok, but I still insist on changing the name. If someone
decided to package the snowball compiler or the C version of the library, there
would be problem. "snowball-java" or "libstemmer-java" sounds more reasonable.

Regarding that POM - why do you add dependency on junit? I don't see any unit
test in there.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]