Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: aspell-en https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225266 ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2007-03-30 02:39 EST ------- rpmlint on SRPM reported W: aspell-en unversioned-explicit-obsoletes aspell-en-gb The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. W: aspell-en unversioned-explicit-obsoletes aspell-en-ca The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. Can you add versions in Obsoletes tag? rpmlint on RPM reported E: aspell-en obsolete-not-provided aspell-en-gb The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. E: aspell-en obsolete-not-provided aspell-en-ca The obsoleted package must also be provided to allow clean upgrade paths and not to break dependencies. But as discussed before https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-March/msg00463.html obsolete not provided is Warning and can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review