[Bug 1024779] Review Request: roger-router - Roger router manager for FRITZ!Box and compatible routers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024779

Volker Fröhlich <volker27@xxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |volker27@xxxxxx



--- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich <volker27@xxxxxx> ---
You can remove the defattrs. They were only necessary up to EL4.

LGPLv2.1 should be LGPLv2+.

"Requires: libroutermanager = %{version}" should have an isa and release macro.

What is the if clause around ldconfig in the libroutermanager scriptlets good
for?

The plugins don't require the license files, as they can't be installed on
their own. I'd leave out the whole %doc lines there.

I think it's not allowed to add license files yourself. However:
incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/libroutermanager/COPYING.LGPL. It's also
wrong in COPYING. Upstream should correct that.

Add -q to the setup macro.

Does roger-router somehow conflict with ffgtk?

I'm usually using _datadir instead of _datarootdir. I don't know whether one
should be preferred over the other though.

You could shorten the files sections like this:

%files plugins-fritzfon
%{_datarootdir}/glib-2.0/schemas/org.tabos.roger.plugins.fritzfon.gschema.xml
%{_libdir}/roger/plugins/fritzfon/

%files ...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]