https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984605 --- Comment #13 from marcindulak <Marcin.Dulak@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #12) > Initial comments: > > - Some 'install' commands are not performed with -p option to preserve > timestamps should be OK now > - I don't see some optimization flag, they are requested by the guidelines i tried exporting FFLAGS, CFLAGS, FOPTIMIZE, COPTIMIZE as mentioned in https://svn.pnl.gov/svn/nwchem/trunk/src/config/makefile.h , but without success (koji: grep "\-O2" build.log - very large file!). It looks like one would have to patch the nwchem Makefiles in order to set different compiler flags. I see that debian http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/n/nwchem/nwchem_6.3+r1-1.debian.tar.gz (e.g. debian/patches/02_makefile_flags.patch) touched the makefile system of nwchem, however nwchem contains also additional packages (global arrays - i think they distribute their own, modified version) and one would have to deal with compiler flags also there. Moreover, nwchem is a big, complex program, and nobody knows how it will react to RPM_OPT_FLAGS, and in case of problems we will be asked to go back to the default nwchem compiler flags. I hope it is a sufficient rationale for letting nwchem to handle compiler flags itself. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6405852 Spec URL: http://marcindulak.fedorapeople.org/packages/nwchem/r03/nwchem.spec SRPM URL: http://marcindulak.fedorapeople.org/packages/nwchem/r03/nwchem-6.3.2-3.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review