Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-metar - Coded METAR weather reports parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228299 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow@xxxxxxxxx 2007-03-29 14:02 EST ------- > if you insist... done in 1.3.0-2. ...^^ Well, OK - Mock Build on FC-6 and FC-Devel (i386) OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License is MIT OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - BuildRequires isn't redundant. OK - %build and %install stages is correct and work. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Changelog section is correct. OK - rpmlint output are silent on RPMs (including sub-package) and SRPM files. others: OK - Should function as described. NO - License file is missing in package. ---------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review