https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036396 Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jakub Dorňák from comment #7) > ad 1.) > > The source from pypi does not contain docs and examples, while the source > from githup does. Is it really better to use the one from pypi? No ;-). But according to the results, this tag has been retagged, you can download source from URL again and then rebuild again with the sources just downloaded. And better file an issue on github of including docs into tarballs on pypi. > ad 2.) > > I am not sure how to fix this. Just "BSD", no extra 'License' needed in the field, See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main > ad 3.) > > The dependancies will be solved by other (sub)packages proposed by me. ----------------------- I will set fedora-review + for this package, however please fix above #1 and #2 before SCM, I'm watching. ;D PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review