https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988648 --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- Spec URL: http://cicku.me/libunity.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/libunity-6.12.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Just a brief look at the spec: > Summary: Unity instrumenting and integration library Somewhat pedantic, but I only took a look at this ticket because I wanted to know whether "Unity" here is ambiguous. More clear would be Summary: Instrumenting and integration library for the Unity shell IMO. > %package devel > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package > %package -n python-%{name} > Summary: Python bindings for libunity Note that the "Requiring Base Package" guidelines are not specific to -devel packages. > %files > %{_libdir}/girepository-1.0/*.typelib > %{_libdir}/libunity.so.* > %{_libdir}/libunity/libunity-protocol-private.so.* Which package owns %{_libdir}/libunity/? > %files devel > %{_libdir}/libunity/libunity-protocol-private.so Please verify how/when this lib is used. Judging based on its path it seems to be a private plugin/extension lib, which is dlopen()'ed at runtime. Verify whether libunity loads it via the non-versioned *.so name or the versioned one. In that case, this file may need to be moved into the correct package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review