https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026432 Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Philip Withnall from comment #5) > • Spec URL: http://people.collabora.co.uk/~pwith/packaging/ghc-pcap.spec > • SRPM URL: http://people.collabora.co.uk/~pwith/packaging/ghc-pcap-0.4.5.2-1.fc19.src.rpm Thanks for the update. It would be nice to have an rpm changelog entry for the changes. > I left the %summary alone and expanded the %description with text from the > libpcap-devel package. Okay you could also put "Haskell bindings for libpcap" into the summary instead. I don't think it is a blocker, I just felt the current summary is slightly verbose, but maybe it is okay. (In reply to Philip Withnall from comment #7) > http://hackage.haskell.org/package/bustle-0.4.3 Cool - congrats! The Requires and BuildRequires look good now. Package APPROVED. I have gone ahead and sponsored you. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review