https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045476 --- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Cristian Ciupitu from comment #5) > (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #4) > > (In reply to Cristian Ciupitu from comment #3) > > > From what I understood on IRC, Fedora 19 is not supported anymore, so I > > > won't review it. > > Not quite. F18 is going EOL soon (IIRC, Jan 14th). F19 will still be > > supported for ca. 1/2 year. > > I was referring to to this new package. It doesn't have to support > Fedora 19 if the author doesn't want to. True, however this would contradict the dnf devs' intentions to have dnf tested, because "replacing yum with dnf is due with f22" (akozumpl on fedora-users). IMO, if they are serious about this, they cannot avoid also providing dnf-core with F19, because this would lock out many Fedora users from testing dnf. Also, I'd like to ask the dnf devs, why this package (dnf-core) exists at all and is not part of dnf. IMO, it doesn't make much sense to separate a plugin-frame work (dnf-core) from the base package (dnf). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review