https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044607 Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(anto.trande@gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #5) > Any progress? I'm waiting for License file. > Adding license texts separate from upstream is explicitly forbidden. Honestly, I read the contrary on the wiki: > However, in situations where upstream is unresponsive, unable, or unwilling to > provide proper full license text as part of the source code, and the indicated > license requires that the full license text be included, Fedora Packagers must > either: > ... > - Include a copy of what they believe the license text is intended to be, as part of the Fedora package in %doc, in order to remain in compliance. It is worth noting that this may place some additional risk on the packager, however, > ... > - Choose not to package that software for Fedora. Am I in wrong ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review