Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-27 13:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Well, I guess that's what I (and octave's author) don't understand. While the > advertising clause is apparently non-binding and likely unenforceable, it does > appear to make it technically incompatible with the GPL. That makes it > impossible for octave, a GPL program, to link to it. So, we can include this > in Fedora, but other Fedora programs can't link to it? My interest in getting > arpack into Fedora was for the benefit of octave. Maybe this should be taken up > with the FSF. I'm interested in arpack for the benefit of freefem++, which is LGPL, so don't say that "other Fedora programs can't link to it". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review