[Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967





------- Additional Comments From qspencer@xxxxxxxx  2007-03-27 11:44 EST -------
(In reply to comment #21)
> I didn't say that it was GPL compatible. We can ask the FSF if we want that
> ruling. The delay on the decision was entirely due to the fact that I hadn't yet
> looked at it (until yesterday).
> 
> If I had to guess, I would say it's not GPL compatible, due to the advertising
> clauses.

Well, I guess that's what I (and octave's author) don't understand. While the
advertising clause is apparently non-binding and likely unenforceable, it does
appear to make it technically incompatible with the GPL. That makes it
impossible for octave, a GPL program, to link to it. So, we can include this in
Fedora, but other Fedora programs can't link to it? My interest in getting
arpack into Fedora was for the benefit of octave. Maybe this should be taken up
with the FSF.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]