https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825461 --- Comment #5 from Robert Spanton <rspanton@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi John, I've finally got around to dealing with the issues you've raised, and I've updated the version in the process. New spec: https://xgoat.com/~rob/rpm/arm-cortex_m-eabi/arm-cortex_m3-eabi-binutils.spec New SRPM: https://xgoat.com/~rob/rpm/arm-cortex_m-eabi/arm-cortex_m-eabi-binutils-2.24-1.fc20.src.rpm rpmlint will give you some warnings from those, but these are apparently to be expected from cross-compiling things. This thread: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-January/160806.html contains someone asking questions about those rpmlint warnings. The warnings from rpmlint fall into the following groups: - cross-directory-hard-link: According to that thread (and other shipping cross-compiling binutils, e.g. avr-binutils), this is OK. - non-standard-dir-in-usr: This is a feature of the cross-compiling toolchain. Again dealt with in that thread, and also following suit on the behaviour of other already shipping cross-compiling binutils packages. The BuildRequires of just texinfo appears to be fine to me. It builds in mock with no problems. Regarding the licence: The sources contain GPL v2+ and v3+. I'm following suit on what the binutils package does, and labelling this as GPLv3+. I assume this is correct. Cheers, Rob -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review