https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036130 --- Comment #11 from Mikko Tiihonen <mikko.tiihonen@xxxxxx> --- Spec URL: https://www.dropbox.com/s/9cezsd32j7ppj5q/plv8.spec SRPM URL: https://www.dropbox.com/s/8q89vbvggh9dz5o/plv8-1.4.1-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: 3rd revision of package comment 9 review: - fixed findings 1,4,5,6,7,8 and 9 - about 3: the 6E-epel failed due to missing pg 9.2 package DEBUG util.py:264: Getting requirements for plv8-1.4.1-1.el6.src DEBUG util.py:264: Error: No Package found for postgresql-devel >= 9.2 - I found slides that say plv8 supports pg >= 8.4 -> updated spec to allow older versions in hope that rhel builds will succeed - about 2: I had initially named the package postgresql-plv8 but Pavel Raiskup said it will be confused with official postgresql packages. If plv8 is not acceptable either then I propose we decide postgresql-<package> to be from official postgresql sources and postgresql-ext-<package> be any extension and document the practice in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines Should I keep plv8 or rename it to postgresql-ext-plv8 ? Other changes: - fixed plv8.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/plv8/README - fixed plv8-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review