[Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034


bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |medium




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-03-27 05:59 EST -------
(In reply to comment #39)
> (In reply to comment #37)
> 
> > Among them, some header files have #ifdef judgments for
> > HAVE_MINUIT2, HAVE_NUMARRAY, BOOST_DEFECT.
> > Would you check if all of the ifdef check for these values
> > are of no problem?
> 
> I haven't checked the package, but in general there 
> should never be such conditionals in the API. Is there
> something special in that package?

I agree. Generally header files included in -devel package
should not have #ifdef conditionals like above..
This usually causes API breakage, and may cause problems
when other applications want to use these header files
with some macros re-defined.

(In reply to comment #38)
> There are a number of #ifdef with macros of the from HAVE_xxx.   
> All are defined
> in config.h.   What was misssing, I think, 
> is installation of the config.h file
> itself.   That is now fixed in the upstream sources.

However, having header files created by autotools included as
-devel header files are generally considered as BAD
( see the explanation by Michael Schwendt and Hans de Goede
  on bug 232342 ).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]