[Bug 960664] Review Request: chicken - A practical and portable Scheme system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960664

Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bugs.michael@xxxxxxx



--- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> ---
With regard to bug 1001262 (duplicate docs due to F20UnversionedDocDirs
change), the following questions have turned up:

 * Why has a separate -doc subpackage been created for the documentation? It is
only 300KB small. It would be really okay to include it in the base package.
That would also be a very easy way to fix bug 1001262.

 * Why is the -doc subpackage not "noarch"?

 * For the base package, a split between runtime and build-time/development
would have made sense. Compiled programs will be linked with libchicken, which
could reside in a -libs runtime subpackage.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]