https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1042809 gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- ISSUES: [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 12 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1042809-jboss- jacc-1.5-api/licensecheck.txt LGPL (v2.1 or later): src/test/java/org/jboss/test/jacc/implies/WebResourcePermissionImpliesTestCase.java [!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [?]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [?]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. license field should be: (CDDL or GPLv2 with exceptions) or LGPLv2+ jboss-jacc-1.5-api.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/jboss-jacc-1.5-api/LICENSE jboss-jacc-1.5-api-javadoc.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/jboss-jacc-1.5-api-javadoc/LICENSE see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review