Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyml - Poly/ML compiler and runtime system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229728 ------- Additional Comments From bos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-26 23:18 EST ------- This package has a few problems that need to be addressed. The spec file contains wild cards in the %files section. This makes it difficult to verify that the package contains all the files it should. The docs are huge (2 megabytes). Please split them into a separate -doc package. There are some rpmlint warnings: W: polyml devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libpolyml.so W: polyml devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libpolymain.a These ought to be in a separate -devel package, I think. In the spec file, please compress the BuldRequires lines into a single entry. Please provide a proper description for the -libs package. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review