[Bug 1040453] Review Request: rubygem-rspec-longrun - RSpec formatter for long-running specs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040453



--- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
* Bundler, Rake
  - We are typically trying to get rid of these (an usually quite
successfully).

* Move documentation into -doc subpackage
  - Large documentation is usually good to split into -doc subpackage
  - You can move there also all files not needed for runtime, i.e. examples,
    spec, Gemfile, Rakefile

* Gem repack
  - Please go with 'gem spec %{SOURCE0} -l --ruby > %{gem_name}.gemspec' as
    specified in guidelines. You will save yourself the 'git' kung-fu.
  - The upstream .gemspec, although provided, was never intended to be used for
    repackaging.

* %gem_install in EPEL6
  - Since RHEL 6.5, rubygems know how to use %gem_install macro. This applies
    also to rubygems-devel package (these two are related).

* URL:
  - The upstream url should be http://github.com/mdub/rspec-longrun if I am not
    wrong

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]