https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705 --- Comment #21 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- observed issues: [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 9 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1011705-datanucleus- core/licensecheck.txt see src/java/org/datanucleus/util/Base64.java /********************************************************************** //Copyright 2003-2009 Christian d'Heureuse, Inventec Informatik AG, Zurich, Switzerland //www.source-code.biz, www.inventec.ch/chdh // //This module is multi-licensed and may be used under the terms //of any of the following licenses: // //EPL, Eclipse Public License, http://www.eclipse.org/legal //LGPL, GNU Lesser General Public License, http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html //AL, Apache License, http://www.apache.org/licenses //BSD, BSD License, http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php // //Please contact the author if you need another license. //This module is provided "as is", without warranties of any kind. [?]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. *********** see src/java/org/datanucleus/util/Base64.java *********** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review